Inhuman By Design
Posted on Mar 23rd, 2006
by
Moltencuriosity
Inhumanity
Throughout history, mankind has considered those that are cold, calculated killers, to be inhuman. The weapons designer, who kills indirectly at a distance, should be considered a member of this group. Before discussing what is inhuman about the weapons designer, humanity itself must be defined. To be considered human is more than being born part of the human race. To be human is to accept the core morals, every child is taught from birth, without question. A human must have a certain amount of compassion and empathy for the suffering of a fellow human being. Respect for another's life must also be a defining factor in a person's humanity; without respect for life, the existence of mankind is pointless.
The United States Military has had a significant effect on world events and politics through the effective use (or threat of use) of its armed forces against percieved outside aggressors. The United States has the most advanced and deadly arsenal of weapons ever created. The Oxford English Dictionary describes a weapon as "an instrument of any kind used in warfare or in combat to attack and overcome an enemy" (Oxford English Dictionary 224). All of the weapons ever created for the American war machine have been made possible by the tireless efforts of exceptionally talented weapons designers, employed by the U.S. These designers of death cannot be considered human when the very thing they are hired to do is, in itself, inhuman.
The weapons designer must consider a great deal in the design of a new weapon. A weapon must be effective on the battlefield, yet user friendly at the same time. The designer of the M16A2 semi-automatic rifle never considered the morality of asking a child, barely out of high school to pick that same weapon up and personally commit murder in the name of freedom. The designer is morally bankrupt in knowing that the M16 was not designed to kill an enemy; the M16 is designed to cause injuries that will effectively take three combatants out of battle, knowing that a dead man that will be left where he lay during the conflict is counter productive during an engagement, while a seriously injured man requires two soldiers to carry him to safety.
By their very nature, weapons cause suffering to those they are used upon and others nowhere near the fighting. The operators manual for the M16A2 rifle states, "Note that fire on a target at 300 meters is also effective on a 400 meter target" (Department of the Army 132-33). What the weapons designer doesn't mention, however, is the fact that even if the person being struck by a bullet at 300 meters is spared suffering at death, that individuals family will continue to suffer for years to come. A fatherless child is not comforted by the fact that the designer was just doing a job. The apathy required to look past the direct and indirect misery caused by the designer's talents is truly inhuman.
Explosive materials have been in use since ancient China; the Improvised Munitions Handbook describes one such material. "PETN (pentaerythrite tetranitrate) has a detonation velocity of 21,000 feet per second" (Department of the Army section 14-9). A designer who creates this kind of potential carnage is not any more human than an individual who sets off a truck bomb at the FBI headquarters in Oklahoma. It takes a certain amount of ruthlessness and disrespect for human life to create something so devastating. FM 21-26 states, "the military grid reference system requires at least an 8 digit grid co ordinance for accurate, effective targeting." (Department of the Army section 4-22). It only takes a few numbers to cause a great deal of pain and suffering.
From mankind's earliest history, using of weapons to strengthen personal or political positions has been necessary. As time went on, however, weapons designers created instruments of destruction that have increased human suffering at a geometric rate. Disassociating oneself from the human element of war is sometimes a necessary evil in order to accomplish the task of insuring a country's sovereignty. At some point, however, the government should consider how the designers of weapons have been forced out of the human race in the name of freedom. When an individual's morals, compassion and respect for human life are lost, that person can no longer be considered part of humanity; they are in fact, inhuman.
Works Cited
Army, Department of the, ed. TM 31-210 / Improvised Munitions Handbook. Philadelphia: Army, 1969.
Army, Department of the, ed. TM 9-1005-10/1A / Rifle, 5.56mm, M16A2 W/E. Washington D.C.: Army, 1994.
Army, Department of the, ed. FM 21-26 / Map Reading and Land Navigation.
Washington D.C.: Army, 1987.
Milford, Humphrey, ed. Oxford English Dictionary. New York:
OMGoodness!!!
Well, we have all been snoring far, far too long.
It is my prayer that those of us who have been struggling for sooo long to turn the tide of awareness are joined now with zillions of the new
PeaceMakers our intentions towards peace are growing strong.
I hope you are right Peggy.
Troy,
I so agree with your so-called “rant” and I just want to add that I think many (most?) of today's video games – heck even yesterday's video games – train young people to think nothing of shooting at another human being. What is that doing to the minds of our children? Look at all of the violence – SEVEN-year-olds bringing a gun to school!!
And this just in! On Friday a navy seal came to my son's middle school as a reward for the kids, since they were taking their standardized tests. He talked about what it means to have character. He told jokes (“here's how the coast guard does pushups… I should have joined the coast guard!”) and did some harlem globe trotters tricks with a basketball. My son recounted all of this to me. He started by saying, “A navy seal was at school today, but not to recruit…” After he told me all about this guy (you could tell he really enjoyed it), I explained how actually it really was a form of recruitment. After we talked for awhile, I saw the lightbulb go off and he shook his head. However, now that a couple of days have gone by, he still talks about it with awe, and when he sees the look on my face he says, “don't worry mom.” I worry.
I don't see how a person can go to a middle school and begin the recruiting process with a clear conscience. I just wanted to cry.
Diane
inhuman: “without compunction or human feeling”
how is calling weapons designers ‘inhuman’ any less inhuman than what they do? They have families to support…friends to visit….struggles to endure…they’re no less human than you or I.
Seems mechanical to view people ‘as’ their job descriptions.
If you view them as your enemies, then your words are weapons, instruments of a kind, used to attack your enemies.
Anti-war is not pro-peace.
Stop. Love. Love some more.
In Peace,
-Rob
Rob - Have you served in the military? Have you seen what those weapons do to living breathing humanbeings?
I know what they do because I used to train soldiers to use them. One of my jobs was to insure that our soldiers were able to kill in a variety of different ways. In that sense, I was inhuman; it is sure that I have gained my humanity back, but I could not think about the loss of human life that you can be sure I am partially responsible for.
I am not saying what I did was evil or wrong, but I am saying is that it was inhuman to not even considder the cost to himan life that would come in the future due to the training I gave those soldiers.
A weapons designer is not good or evil,(nor my enemy) but inhuman is a state that a person who designs weapons meant for killing other humans must stay in. If I had stopped to consider the lives that would be lost due to the explosives training I gave my platoon, I would not have been able to do my job efficiently. I realize now the kind of damage that I may have (probably did) caused and I am ashamed. This rant of mine is a kind of catharsis for me that allows me to release some of the demons. I actually am not anti-war; it is sometimes needed even if it is ugly in many ways.
if you are not now who you were then, then you have no reason to be ashamed. “It seemed like a good idea at the time” is the case. As Socrates taught, ‘Man always chooses what he believes to be the good’.
Can an inhuman being become a human being? might sooner say that one can simply grow in awareness. It doesn’t have to be black and white…human/inhuman.
At any rate, it may simply be semantics. Clearly there is a shared love of Love and Integrity.
In Peace,
-Rob
I don't remember that from Socrates(Plato), but I do seem to remember Aristotle writing a treatsy on just that idea. There are, however, many ideas that were passed forward and revamped. I wonder, had Socrates taken the offer Crito had given him, would we still be quoting him?
And yes integrity is very important to me, much the same as genuine sentiment given clearly.
Wow. Terrible. Unfathomable to me humans can be capable of this. Sick. Thanks for the post and raising awareness.
In a way we really are what we do. If we can separate our work from our being, then we are in the wrong job. Our life's work should be (IMO) in order to “perfect our gifts” while “in service to, and in cooperation with others.” Just my further 2 cents after reading The Reinvention of Work on vacation!
You know Troy, you really should blog more often. Only once? We're all being cheated out of your great insights. : ) More please….
The designer of the M16A2 semi-automatic rifle never considered the morality of asking a child, barely out of high school to pick that same weapon up and personally commit murder in the name of freedom.
this brought chills in me
in Israel its mandatory army and one of our Zaadz friends Solomon Seagal may have to do exactly that… and if i were a guy…. i would too…
so let us together in his words that i 100% agree with, fight the system and replace it with a system based on true values, not on a random selection of traditional ones. A society that respects the individual and permits him to fulfill his dreams. CLICK here for the whole quote
still.. i really love the photo….